Somatic symptom and functional disorders
Somatic and functional disorders: the AU general practice approach
Somatic symptom disorder (SSD) is diagnosed on positive features — distressing symptoms with excessive illness-related thoughts or behaviours — not by excluding disease. Medical illness and SSD can coexist.
Functional neurological disorder (FND) has positive clinical signs (Hoover's sign, tremor entrainment) and is not a diagnosis of exclusion. Functional somatic syndromes — IBS, fibromyalgia, ME/CFS, POTS — share central sensitisation mechanisms.
First-line: validate symptoms, explain the neurobiological mechanism, limit investigation, address comorbid depression or anxiety, and refer for CBT or acceptance-commitment therapy. Opioids and benzodiazepines worsen outcomes.
Somatic and functional disorders are responsible for a substantial proportion of Australian general practice workload. Medically unexplained symptoms — physical symptoms without a fully adequate biomedical explanation — account for 15–30% of consultations in some estimates. This does not mean the symptoms are not real; it means the mechanism involves the nervous system’s processing of sensation rather than structural tissue damage detectable on current investigations.
Understanding the modern diagnostic framework matters for patient outcomes. Outdated approaches — “we couldn’t find anything wrong,” prolonged investigation cascades, implicit or explicit dismissal — cause substantial harm. eTG complete and the RACGP support the positive diagnostic framework articulated in DSM-5 and the growing neurobiological literature on central sensitisation and functional neurological disorder.
A. Core clinical — the AU general-practice framework
DSM-5 somatic symptom and related disorders
Somatic symptom disorder (SSD):
- ≥1 distressing somatic symptom causing impairment
- Excessive thoughts, feelings, or behaviours related to symptoms or health concerns, operationalised as at least one of:
- Disproportionate persistent thoughts about the seriousness of symptoms
- Persistently high anxiety about health or symptoms
- Excessive time or energy devoted to symptoms or health concerns
- Duration ≥6 months (specific symptoms may change over time)
- Coexisting medical illness does not exclude the diagnosis — a patient with genuine cardiac disease can also have SSD
Illness anxiety disorder (IAD) (formerly hypochondriasis in most):
- Preoccupation with having or acquiring a serious illness, despite mild or absent somatic symptoms
- High health anxiety and excessive checking or avoidance behaviours
- ≥6 months
Functional neurological disorder (FND / conversion disorder):
- ≥1 neurological symptom of altered voluntary motor or sensory function
- Positive clinical findings showing incompatibility with recognised neurological disease — FND is NOT a diagnosis of exclusion (Stone et al., Brain 2018)
- Significant distress or impairment
The DSM-5 shift (2013) away from requiring exclusion of medical disease towards positive identification of excessive health-related cognition and behaviour was grounded in clinical research and clinically important. Patients with physical illness can develop SSD; the diagnosis captures the excessive response, not the absence of pathology.
Functional somatic syndromes cluster
A related set of conditions — sometimes called central sensitivity syndromes — share overlapping pathophysiology of central nervous system sensitisation, descending pain modulation impairment, and autonomic dysregulation:
- Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)
- Fibromyalgia
- Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS)
- Chronic pelvic pain
- Temporomandibular joint dysfunction
- Vulvodynia
- Interstitial cystitis
- Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS)
- Hypermobility spectrum disorders (hEDS overlap)
- Mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS overlap)
Patients frequently have more than one of these conditions simultaneously. Trauma history — particularly childhood adversity — is common. Genetic clustering in families has been demonstrated.
Functional neurological disorder — recognising the positive signs
FND has specific positive diagnostic findings that can be demonstrated at the bedside. Recognising these changes the consultation from “I can’t find anything wrong” to “here’s the test that shows me exactly what’s happening.”
Hoover’s sign (functional leg weakness):
- Test involuntary hip extension in the weak leg by pressing down on the heel of the normal leg against resistance
- If hip extension in the weak leg occurs during this manoeuvre, it demonstrates intact motor pathways — the voluntary weakness is due to abnormal motor planning, not structural nerve or muscle damage
Tremor entrainment (functional tremor):
- Ask the patient to make a rhythmic tapping movement with the unaffected hand at a set pace
- Functional tremor entrains to the tapping frequency (or disappears); organic tremor does not change
Eye closure resistance (functional seizures):
- During an episode, functional seizures typically show active resistance when the examiner attempts to open the eyelids
- Epileptic seizures do not produce active resistance
Inconsistency with distraction: functional motor and sensory symptoms vary with attention — better when distracted, worse when focused.
History and examination
A thorough history targeting the pattern of symptoms, triggers, and the relationship between symptoms and psychological states is essential. Specifically:
- Onset and precipitant — acute onset often following a physical event (minor injury, viral illness, medical procedure) or significant life stressor
- Pattern — symptoms that vary with attention, stress, or psychological state
- Timeline — often chronic from a relatively fixed onset
- Previous investigations — extent of prior workup; prior diagnoses
- Trauma history — sensitively enquired; childhood adversity, assault, major life trauma
- Comorbidities — depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), PTSD screen, substance use
- Healthcare experience — multiple clinicians, multiple diagnoses, conflicting messages, prior dismissal
Examination serves two purposes: excluding medical mimics and demonstrating positive functional signs.
B. Evidence on management — what works and what harms
Communication and diagnosis
The single most important intervention is clear, positive, validating communication of the diagnosis. Stone et al. (Brain 2018) demonstrated that explanation of the diagnosis, when framed positively and matched with demonstrating the positive clinical sign, is itself therapeutic — it reduces anxiety, healthcare utilisation, and symptom amplification.
Key elements:
- “This is a recognised condition” — naming it removes the void of uncertainty
- “Your brain has developed a problem with how it controls movement/processes sensation — not damage to the nerves or muscles themselves”
- “This is real — I’m not suggesting it’s imagined”
- “There are effective treatments”
- Share Neurosymptoms.org for FND
What to avoid: “there’s nothing wrong,” “it’s psychosomatic” (without explanation), “stress is causing this” (without neurobiological framing), “the tests were all normal” as the only response.
CBT and psychological therapies
CBT adapted for somatic concerns and health anxiety has the strongest evidence base across SSD and IAD — Cochrane reviews demonstrate moderate effect sizes for symptom reduction, health anxiety, and healthcare use reduction. Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is particularly valuable when the primary problem is catastrophising and distress about distress. CBT referral via Mental Health Care Plan (MBS items 2715/2717) is the appropriate pathway.
FND-specific physiotherapy — a distinct specialisation from standard physiotherapy — has RCT evidence (Nielsen et al., Stone et al.) for functional motor disorders. Referral to an FND-trained physiotherapist (access growing in Australia via FND Hope Australia) is recommended alongside psychotherapy.
Pharmacotherapy
Pharmacotherapy addresses comorbidities, not SSD directly:
- SSRIs or SNRIs for comorbid depression or anxiety — General Schedule; standard treatment, not a specific SSD drug
- Low-dose amitriptyline (10–25 mg nocte) — Cochrane evidence in fibromyalgia, IBS-associated pain, neuropathic pain; modulates descending pain pathways
- Duloxetine — evidence in fibromyalgia, neuropathic pain; Authority Required for specified neuropathic pain indications
- Pregabalin or gabapentin — Authority Required for neuropathic pain; SafeScript-monitored; relevant diversion and dependence risk — prescribe cautiously and with clear review plans
- Opioids — avoid in somatic and functional disorders; NICE NG193 recommends against; opioid-induced hyperalgesia worsens central sensitisation; SafeScript and Real-Time Prescription Monitoring (RTPM) apply
- Benzodiazepines — tolerance, dependence, disinhibition; avoid as first-line or chronic therapy in somatic disorders
What harms patients
- Repeated unnecessary investigations — reinforces “something wrong but undetected” cognition
- Facilitated diagnostic shopping across multiple specialists
- Polypharmacy without structured review
- Opioid and benzodiazepine prescribing
- Lack of consistent therapeutic relationship
- Dismissal or disbelief
C. Functional somatic syndromes — specific management notes
IBS: CBT, low-FODMAP dietary approach (dietitian referral), low-dose amitriptyline or mebeverine for pain, RACGP IBS guidelines.
Fibromyalgia: graduated exercise (walking, water aerobics), CBT, amitriptyline 10–25 mg nocte, duloxetine, pregabalin (with caution), multidisciplinary pain programme.
ME/CFS: pacing and activity management is foundational — “boom-bust” cycles worsen post-exertional malaise; graded exercise requires specialist guidance and should not be applied if there is significant post-exertional malaise; CBT for fatigue management; Royal Australian College of Physicians guidance.
POTS: increased salt and fluid intake, compression garments, graduated upright exercise programme, beta-blockers or fludrocortisone in refractory cases (specialist cardiologist or neurologist).
D. Australian operations
MBS items
- Item 23 — Level B GP attendance
- Item 36 / 44 — longer Level C / D consultations (these patients routinely need more time)
- Item 2715 / 2717 — Mental Health Care Plan (preparation and review)
- Item 80000–80020 — psychology Better Access (10 subsidised sessions/year)
- Item 81335 — telehealth psychology
- Item 132 / 133 — consultant physician (psychiatry) initial and subsequent
- Item 291 / 293 — psychiatrist consultation
- Item 965 / 967 — GPCCMP (replacing GPMP/TCA from 1 July 2025); valuable for chronic complex somatic presentations requiring allied health coordination
- Item 10960 — allied health services under EPC plan (physiotherapy, OT)
- Item 10968 — exercise physiology under EPC plan
PBS prescribing
- SSRIs, SNRIs — General Schedule (comorbid depression/anxiety)
- Amitriptyline, nortriptyline — General Schedule
- Duloxetine — Authority for major depression, GAD, diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain
- Pregabalin, gabapentin — Authority for neuropathic pain; SafeScript/RTPM monitored
- Opioids, benzodiazepines — SafeScript/RTPM monitored; avoid in SSD and functional disorders
Specialist referral pathways
- Psychologist (CBT or ACT-trained) — first-line; specify somatic focus or chronic illness experience in referral
- FND clinics — Royal Melbourne Hospital, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney
- Multidisciplinary pain clinic — chronic functional pain overlapping with CPSP
- Neurologist — initial FND diagnosis confirmation; ongoing input as needed
- Psychiatrist — complex comorbidity, refractory cases
Australian patient resources
- Neurosymptoms.org (Jon Stone) — the best patient resource for FND; free, comprehensive, research-grounded
- FND Hope Australia / FND Australia — patient organisation; peer support; information
- MindSpot — free Macquarie University internet-delivered CBT for anxiety, depression, chronic pain; no GP referral required
- This Way Up — AU-developed iCBT; anxiety, depression, chronic pain programmes
- Tame the Beast (Lorimer Moseley, UniSA) — pain neuroscience education; freely accessible
- Pain Australia — patient organisation for chronic pain
- Chronic Pain Australia — peer support and advocacy
E. Special populations
Adolescents and young adults. Functional symptoms including functional seizures (PNES) and functional weakness are more common in young women. Trauma-informed and developmentally appropriate communication is essential. Paediatric neurology or adolescent psychiatry referral may be appropriate.
Patients with established medical illness. SSD and medical illness commonly co-exist. Patients with multiple sclerosis, lupus, cardiac disease, or cancer can also have SSD overlaid. The challenge is not to attribute all symptoms to the SSD diagnosis and miss new organic developments — periodic re-evaluation and willingness to revise the formulation are essential.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients. Trauma history including intergenerational trauma and experiences of racism within healthcare are prevalent. A trauma-informed, culturally safe approach is foundational. Engagement with Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations (ACCHOs) supports holistic, community-centred care.
Patients with disability support or workers’ compensation claims. Document objectively, focus on functional capacity rather than symptom counts, and provide consistent communication across the treating team. Avoid colluding with secondary gain framing — most patients with SSD are not deliberately producing symptoms — but attend to system factors that may inadvertently reinforce illness behaviour.
When to escalate
Urgent psychiatric referral when: active suicidal ideation, severe self-harm, acute psychosis, or decompensated major depression are identified alongside somatic presentations.
Routine neuropsychiatry or FND clinic: confirmed or suspected FND with functional disability not improving with explanation and brief intervention.
Pain medicine specialist or multidisciplinary pain programme: chronic functional somatic pain with significant functional impairment.
Revise the diagnosis and reinvestigate if: new organic symptoms emerge, examination findings change, or the presentation does not fit the established pattern. Anchoring to a somatic/functional diagnosis can result in missed organic disease.
What this article is and is not
This article is general health information based on eTG complete, the RACGP, NICE NG10 and NICE NG193, Stone et al. (Brain 2018), the FND Society, RANZCP guidelines, and Cochrane systematic reviews. It is not personal medical advice and does not create a doctor–patient relationship.
For Australian consumer resources: Neurosymptoms.org, MindSpot, This Way Up, HealthDirect.
For mental health crisis: Lifeline 13 11 14, Beyond Blue 1300 22 4636, 13YARN 13 92 76 (First Nations).
Sources cited
- eTG complete — Somatic symptom and functional disorders
- RACGP — Functional disorders in general practice (AFP)
- NICE NG10 — Persistent physical symptoms: assessment and management
- NICE NG193 — Chronic primary pain
- Stone J et al. — Functional neurological disorder (Brain 2018)
- Neurosymptoms.org — Patient education for FND (Jon Stone)
- FND Society — International clinical practice guidelines
- RANZCP — Psychotherapy guidelines for functional somatic syndromes
- Cochrane Library — Psychological treatments for somatic symptom disorders
- DSM-5-TR — Somatic Symptom and Related Disorders
- MindSpot — Free internet-delivered CBT (Macquarie University)
- This Way Up — AU-developed iCBT
- Pain Australia
- HealthDirect
Frequently asked questions
-
How do I explain a somatic symptom or functional diagnosis to a patient without them feeling dismissed?
The framing matters enormously. Begin by validating: 'I can see these symptoms are real and causing significant suffering — I believe you.' Then provide a positive explanation, not an absence: 'This is a recognised condition called somatic symptom disorder — it means the nervous system and the way the brain processes sensation have become disrupted, producing real symptoms.' For FND specifically, showing the positive clinical sign helps: 'When I do this test it shows me exactly why your leg isn't working the way you expect it to.' Avoid: 'We couldn't find anything wrong'; 'It's all in your head'; 'This is just stress.' Offer treatment and hope: 'There are established therapies for this, and many people do improve significantly.' The [Neurosymptoms.org](https://www.neurosymptoms.org) website (Jon Stone, University of Edinburgh) is the best patient resource for FND and can be shared at the consultation.
-
What is the GP's role in managing these patients over time?
The general practitioner's therapeutic role in somatic and functional disorders is substantial. A consistent, predictable, validating GP relationship is itself well-supported by research — it reduces fragmentation, limits unnecessary investigation, and provides containment. Practically: schedule regular planned appointments (not crisis-only), set clear boundaries around investigation and referral, consolidate prescribing with one prescriber, and communicate openly and consistently with the mental health team. Avoid diagnostic shopping — fragmented care driven by each specialist pursuing their own investigation cascade worsens outcomes. Coordinate care around a small, trusted team. The [RACGP](https://www.racgp.org.au) recognises the GP as the pivotal coordinator in functional somatic syndrome management.
-
Which psychological therapies have the strongest evidence?
Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) tailored to health anxiety and somatic concerns has the strongest evidence base — multiple Cochrane reviews and meta-analyses demonstrate moderate effect sizes in reducing symptom severity, health anxiety, and healthcare utilisation. Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is particularly valuable when distress about the distress predominates. FND-specific physiotherapy — a distinct discipline from general physiotherapy — has RCT evidence for functional motor disorders. Multidisciplinary pain and rehabilitation programmes combining physiotherapy, psychology, medicine, and occupational therapy have the best evidence for functional somatic syndromes as a group. Referral via Mental Health Care Plan (MBS items 2715/2717) facilitates subsidised psychology access. [MindSpot](https://www.mindspot.org.au) offers free internet-delivered CBT for anxiety and depression, accessible without GP referral.
-
Should I stop investigating when I suspect a somatic or functional cause?
Investigations should be targeted and proportionate — enough to exclude reasonable medical mimics, but not an open-ended cascade. The key principle from [NICE NG10](https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng10) is that repeated investigation reinforces the message that 'something is wrong but undetected,' which worsens the cognitive pattern driving somatic symptoms. For FND, a positive diagnosis based on clinical signs means further neurological imaging is rarely needed once a competent neurology assessment has been done. For SSD, once baseline workup has excluded major organic disease, communicating that the workup is complete and the diagnosis is established is itself therapeutic. Pitfalls: anchoring to a somatic diagnosis when the patient is actually developing an organic condition — review the diagnosis if new features emerge; be willing to revise.
-
What medications have a role in these conditions?
Pharmacotherapy plays an adjunctive, not primary, role. Comorbid depression and anxiety should be treated with SSRIs or SNRIs — these are standard-of-care for the comorbidities, not a direct treatment for SSD itself. Low-dose TCAs (amitriptyline 10–25 mg nocte) and SNRIs (duloxetine) have Cochrane evidence in functional somatic syndromes associated with nociplastic pain — fibromyalgia, IBS, neuropathic pain overlap. Pregabalin and gabapentin have PBS authority for neuropathic pain but are SafeScript-monitored; use with caution given diversion and dependence risks. Opioids — limited evidence; significant harm including opioid-induced hyperalgesia; SafeScript monitored; avoid in SSD and FND. Benzodiazepines — tolerance, dependence, disinhibition; avoid in chronic somatic conditions.
Source quality
Sources grouped by evidence tier. AU primary tier first; international where AU is silent or lagging; named-author reconstruction where guidelines have not yet caught up. How tiers work.
-
T1 AU primary 6 sources -
T2 International primary 5 sources -
T3 Named-author reconstruction 1 source